Elon Musk Responds to Tesla Model S Incident, Blames Firefighters for Worsening the Fire

There have been many happy moments for Tesla this year, but on Tuesday, the story of a Model S catching fire after a crash – fortunately without any casualties or injuries, cast some rainy clouds over the California-based maker of electric cars. A video of the incident quickly spread around the web hurting Tesla’s stock as shares fell from $190 to a low near $168, before jumping up to around $181 on Friday.

Today, the company responded through its founder and CEO, Elon Musk. In a long statement, Musk explained that the cause of the accident was a large metal object that had fallen off a truck and which impaled the Model S’ quarter-inch thick underbody panel.

He said the impact resulted in a fire of the front battery module and surprisingly, placed some of the blame on the firefighters for making the fire worse after wrongly punching the metal firewall.

Musk said that owners of the Model S should not be concerned about a fire risk noting that it is “safer to power a car with a battery than a large tank of highly flammable liquid.” He also added the email correspondence with the owner of the car, who thanked Tesla for the support and stated that he is “still a big fan” of the Model S.

You can read the full statement and email below.


About the Model S fire
By Elon Musk, Chairman, Product Architect & CEO

Earlier this week, a Model S traveling at highway speed struck a large metal object, causing significant damage to the vehicle. A curved section that fell off a semi-trailer was recovered from the roadway near where the accident occurred and, according to the road crew that was on the scene, appears to be the culprit. The geometry of the object caused a powerful lever action as it went under the car, punching upward and impaling the Model S with a peak force on the order of 25 tons. Only a force of this magnitude would be strong enough to punch a 3 inch diameter hole through the quarter inch armor plate protecting the base of the vehicle.

The Model S owner was nonetheless able to exit the highway as instructed by the onboard alert system, bring the car to a stop and depart the vehicle without injury. A fire caused by the impact began in the front battery module – the battery pack has a total of 16 modules – but was contained to the front section of the car by internal firewalls within the pack. Vents built into the battery pack directed the flames down towards the road and away from the vehicle.

When the fire department arrived, they observed standard procedure, which was to gain access to the source of the fire by puncturing holes in the top of the battery’s protective metal plate and applying water. For the Model S lithium-ion battery, it was correct to apply water (vs. dry chemical extinguisher), but not to puncture the metal firewall, as the newly created holes allowed the flames to then vent upwards into the front trunk section of the Model S. Nonetheless, a combination of water followed by dry chemical extinguisher quickly brought the fire to an end.

It is important to note that the fire in the battery was contained to a small section near the front by the internal firewalls built into the pack structure. At no point did fire enter the passenger compartment.

Had a conventional gasoline car encountered the same object on the highway, the result could have been far worse. A typical gasoline car only has a thin metal sheet protecting the underbody, leaving it vulnerable to destruction of the fuel supply lines or fuel tank, which causes a pool of gasoline to form and often burn the entire car to the ground. In contrast, the combustion energy of our battery pack is only about 10% of the energy contained in a gasoline tank and is divided into 16 modules with firewalls in between. As a consequence, the effective combustion potential is only about 1% that of the fuel in a comparable gasoline sedan.

The nationwide driving statistics make this very clear: there are 150,000 car fires per year according to the National Fire Protection Association, and Americans drive about 3 trillion miles per year according to the Department of Transportation. That equates to 1 vehicle fire for every 20 million miles driven, compared to 1 fire in over 100 million miles for Tesla. This means you are 5 times more likely to experience a fire in a conventional gasoline car than a Tesla!

For consumers concerned about fire risk, there should be absolutely zero doubt that it is safer to power a car with a battery than a large tank of highly flammable liquid.

Below is our email correspondence with the Model S owner that experienced the fire, reprinted with his permission:

From: robert Carlson

Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 12:53 PM

To: Jerome Guillen

Subject: carlson 0389

Mr. Guillen,

Thanks for the support. I completely agree with the assessment to date. I guess you can test for everything, but some other celestial bullet comes along and challenges your design. I agree that the car performed very well under such an extreme test. The batteries went through a controlled burn which the internet images really exaggerates. Anyway, I am still a big fan of your car and look forward to getting back into one. Justin offered a white loaner–thanks. I am also an investor and have to say that the response I am observing is really supportive of the future for electric vehicles. I was thinking this was bound to happen, just not to me. But now it is out there and probably gets a sigh of relief as a test and risk issue-this “doomsday” event has now been tested, and the design and engineering works.

rob carlson

On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:29 PM, Jerome Guillen wrote:

Dear Mr. Carlson:

I am the VP of sales and service for Tesla, reporting directly to Elon Musk, Tesla’s CEO.

I am sorry to hear that you experienced a collision in your Model S 2 days ago. We are happy that the Model S performed in such a way that you were not injured in the accident and that nobody else was hurt.

I believe you have been in contact with Justin Samson, our service manager, since the accident. We are following this case extremely closely and we have sent a team of experts to review your vehicle. All indications are that your Model S drove over large, oddly-shaped metal object which impacted the leading edge of the vehicle’s undercarriage and rotated into the underside of the vehicle (“pole vault” effect). This is a highly uncommon occurrence.

Based on our review thus far, we believe that the Model S performed as designed by limiting the resulting fire to the affected zones only. Given the significant intensity of the impact, which managed to pierce the 1/4 inch bottom plate (something that is extremely hard to do), the Model S energy containment functions operated correctly. In particular, the top cover of the battery provided a strong barrier and there was no apparent propagation of the fire into the cabin. This ensured cabin integrity and occupant safety, which remains our most important goal.

We very much appreciate your support, patience and understanding while we proceed with the investigation. Justin keeps me closely informed. Please feel free to contact me directly, if you have any question or concern.

Best regards,

Jerome Guillen I VP, WW sales and service



VIDEO

Acura’s Iconic Integra Type R Touring Car Returns To The Track For More Action

The restored version of Acura’s Integra Type R racer can rev up to 9,000 rpm.

OMG, 2020 BMW M3 & M4 Really Do Have A Massive Grille And This Is It!

The all-new 2020 BMW M3’s nostrils might actually be bigger than the Concept 4’s.

FCA To Build New Battery Hub At Its Turin Factory

FCA’s Mirafiori plant in Turin, Italy will also be responsible for building the all-electric Fiat 500.

VW Golf Countdown: 2008-2012 Mk6 Made Safety And Comfort Breakthroughs

VW managed to shift 2.85 million units of the sixth-gen Golf, which offered a plethora of driving assist systems as well as a wide selection of petrol and diesel engines.

All-New Honda Jazz Is Hybrid-Only In Europe, Launches In Mid-2020

The 2020 Honda Jazz will pack a standard two-motor hybrid powertrain offering “EV-like driving dynamics”.

2020 Volkswagen Golf Mk8, Here’s (Likely) The First Official Picture

The official unveiling of the all-new 2020 VW Golf will take place Thursday evening on October 24.

Skoda CEO Tells Employees Not To Worry About Potential Move Downmarket

VW reportedly wants Skoda to play in the market segment of cars costing between €10,000 and €20,000.

Huawei To Use 5G To Develop Advanced Self-Driving Car Radars

Huawei is looking to increase its presence in the autonomous technology industry.

VW Will Let You Test Drive A Touareg For Two Days In The UK

UK pricing for VW’s flagship SUV kicks off from £49,135 in SEL trim with a V6 diesel.

China-Bound Skoda Kamiq GT Joins The Crossover Coupe Party

The Kamiq GT will be officially launched on November 4 and is limited to the Chinese car market.