NTSB Report Suggests Tesla’s Autopilot System Could Be At Fault In Fatal Model X Crash

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has released its preliminary report (PDF) on the fatal accident that involved a Tesla Model X in Autopilot mode.

While the report is still preliminary and subject to change, the NTSB says the accident occurred in Mountain View, California on March 23rd at approximately 9:27 am PDT. The 2017 Tesla Model X P100D was traveling south on US Highway 101 in a high-occupancy-vehicle lane.

According to data retrieved from the crossover, the 38-year-old driver was using the “advanced driver assistance features traffic-aware cruise control and autosteer lane-keeping assistance, which Tesla refers to as Autopilot.” As the Model X approved a “paved gore area” dividing the main lanes of US-101 from the SH-85 exit ramp, the crossover moved to the left and entered the gore area.

The Tesla continued traveling through the gore area until it struck a crash attenuator, which was mounted on the end of a concrete barrier, at a speed of approximately 71 mph (114 km/h). Following the collision, the Tesla rotated counterclockwise and the front portion of the vehicle separated from the rest of the Model X. The crossover was also involved in subsequent collisions with a 2017 Audi A4 and a 2010 Mazda 3.

What caused the accident remains the heart of the investigation and the NTSB says the Autopilot system was engaged on four separate occasions during the 32-minute trip including continuously during the final 19 minutes prior to the collision. During these final moments, the Model X provided two visual warnings and one auditory alert for the driver to place his hands on the steering wheel. In the final minute before the collision, hands were detected on the steering wheel for just 34 seconds. In the final six seconds, no hands were detected on the wheel.

While the driver wasn’t keeping his hands on the steering wheel, it appears the Autopilot system steered the crossover into the concrete barrier. As the NTSB notes, eight seconds prior to the crash the Tesla was following a lead vehicle and traveling at around 65 mph (104 km/h). One second later, the model “began a left steering movement” while still following the lead vehicle. Four seconds before the crash, the Model X stopped following the lead vehicle and this caused the crossover to speed up as the cruise control system was set at 75 mph (120 km/h). Three seconds before the crash, the Model X increased its speed from 62 mph (100 km/h) to 70.8 mph (114 km/h).

No braking or evasive steering movements were detected prior to the collision and the NTSB says the crash breached the Model X’s lithium-ion battery pack resulting in a fire. The driver was still belted in his seat but bystanders were able to remove him from the crossover before it was engulfed in flames. The driver later died at a local hospital.

The Mountain View Fire Department extinguished the fire and the Model X was eventually transported to an impound lot in San Mateo. While at the impound lot, the Tesla’s battery “emanated smoke and audible venting.” However, a thermal imaging camera showed it wasn’t actually on fire. Five days after the crash, the battery reignited and was extinguished by the San Mateo Fire Department.

Unfortunately, the crash attenuator on the concrete barrier was damaged by an accident involving a 2010 Toyota Prius on March 12th. The NTSB didn’t make much mention of this, but it’s possible the previous damage could have reduced the attenuator’s effectiveness.

more photos...
  • Spyder Hole Fantome

    I’m not surprised. Some are calling this system the Teslakaze Pilot.

  • Kyle Newberry

    Sad for the loss of life, but I’ll take it to keep real cars and drivers on the road!

  • Alfa Giulia QV

    Sure, the system did play a role in the crash but the real blame should be on the driver for their over reliance on it.

    • brn

      Not so much over reliance, but lack of attention. Per the report, the car repeatedly asked the driver to take control. Makes it easy to put most of the blame on the driver.

  • Can the driver hire the dream team lawyers to fight at the court?

  • TheHake

    A 38 yo professional (he had to be a professional to buy such an expensive car) should not be fooled by advertising like that. It is HIS OWN FAULT. However, I agree that Tesla should stop calling it Autopilot.

    • Jarosław Kotowicz

      No. She was just rich. That’s all.

  • Auf Wiedersehen

    All these accidents that result in fire get the same response from Musk and proponents. “ICE cars catch fire during accidents too.” But NOT 5 days later in an impound lot! Let’s call it what it is. A giant drive-able cell phone and we know what happens to these batteries when they are breached. I would like to see stats on ICE cars that result in fires on scene as opposed to Li-ion battery powered vehicles. Five days later is irrelevant stats as I think we know a gasoline engine will not spontaneously reignite 5 days later. Insane…

  • Perry F. Bruns

    Until battery designs change, we will have to look at fire containment areas for lithium-ion units involved in catastrophic collisions.

  • Vassilis

    The blame can be shared between the system and the driver but I don’t see Tesla admitting to that part of the blame. It’s just sad.

Honda Built Two New Civic Type R Concepts, One With Over 400HP, And This Rally Beast

Dakar-inspired or road-legal with 400hp? New Civic Type R concepts beg the question.

Tesla Model 3 Passes Moose Test Like A Slithering Snake

The electric sedan was aided by the clever packaging with the batteries mounted in the floor.

Facelifted Skoda Superb Sportline Brings RS Looks, Up To 268 Horses

Restyled Skoda Superb Sportline comes as a hatch or wagon and brings a sporty-flavored design inside and out.

New Opel Corsa Unveiled In Pure Electric Form With 134 HP And 330 Km Range

The fully electric Opel Corsa-e has a 50 kWh battery and an instant torque output of 191 lb-ft.

Special Toyota Supra Matte Storm Gray Limited To 24 Units In Japan

Toyota will allocate the special 24 Supras through a lottery to be drawn during the Nurburgring 24 Hours.

Skoda Citigoᵉ iV Debuts As Brand’s First EV With 265-Km Range

The Skoda Citigoᵉ iV features a bigger 36.8‑kWh battery pack than the VW e-Up sister car.

2020 Skoda Superb iV Is A Plug-In Hybrid With 55 Km Of Electric Range

Skoda’s first-ever plug-in hybrid will go on sale across Europe in the beginning of next year.

Restyled Skoda Superb Breaks Cover With Fresh New Tech

The Skoda Superb facelift now features intelligent full LED Matrix headlights and redesigned fog lights.

2020 Skoda Superb, Electric Citigo: Watch The Live Unveiling Of Both Cars Here

Skoda’s facelifted Superb is getting PHEV and Scout derivatives, while the Citigo an electric powertrain.

Rare 1986 Aston Martin V8 Zagato Prototype Selling For £530k

This ultra-rare 1986 Aston Martin V8 Zagato prototype features a coach-built body.