2019 Toyota RAV4 Vs Subaru Forester: What Rugged SUV Would You Spring For?

The 2018 New York Auto Show is in full swing and there’s a clear body style that’s shining through – SUVs – and both Toyota and Subaru had something brand new to bring to the market.

To an enthusiast, the previous generation of the RAV4 was one of the most mundane vehicles you could buy. But to regular consumers, the car did everything well and ticked all of the right boxes. That’s probably one of the reasons why the automaker shifted more than 400,000 units last year, making the RAV4 one of the most popular machines in 2017.

Toyota toughed-up its new generation RAV4

The 2019 RAV4 that was just unveiled promises to bring some pizzazz and enjoyment to the crossover. The RAV4 now features a rugged look that it borrows from some other masculine stalemates – mainly the 4Runner and Tacoma. There’s also a lot of FT-AC Concept, which we saw at last year’s Los Angeles Auto Show, in the design too.

That’s not a bad thing, either, as the RAV4 has a much more aggressive design than the fourth-gen model. It’s not the best-looking SUV, but it’s definitely rugged. Toyota’s traded everything that was soft and vague for chunkier components. The massive hexagonal grille is chunky, the headlights are chunky, the front fascia is chunky, heck, the entire SUV is chunky.

Subaru chose an evolutionary approach for its redesigned Forester

The new 2019 Subaru Forester, on the other hand, is a classier, more conservative SUV. Its exterior design won’t offend anyone and the few rough touches that the crossover does have, like the black trim piece that runs from the front fascia all the way to the back, will delight some consumers.

Unlike the RAV4, Subaru didn’t completely revolutionize the Forester’s design for the new year. Only minor changes have been made to the SUV, like the rounder feature of the front grille, the minimally larger headlights, and larger fog lights. The rear end features lobster-styled taillights and some silver cladding on the rear bumper.

Both get 2.5-liter naturally aspirated engines

Toyota hasn’t announced performance specs yet, but but both the RAV4 and Forester will be powered by 2.5-liter naturally-aspirated four-cylinder engines. It would be kind of pointless, though, to compare them at this point. What we can do, is provide you with a visual comparison between the two machines and see which one you like the best.

Here they are side-by-side

At the front, the vehicles are drastically different. Toyota’s design is more in line with an angry ferocious animal, while the Forester looks softer with rounder lines.

Around the side, both the Forester and RAV4 share similar designs. They’re both SUVs, so that’s not surprising. To our eyes, the RAV4’s sculpted D-pillar makes it the more aggressive offering.

It’s the same story at the back. The Forester has the classic, upright rear end, while the RAV4’s behind has a more angular design.

Their interiors follow a similar layout and theme with accents except for one major difference – the Forester’s touchscreen is integrated into the center console, while the RAV4’s looks like it’s been tacked onto the top. And the Subaru, oddly enough, is the vehicle with the more daring blueprint.

Time to tell us what you think

So, which one would you spend your hard earned money on? Would you go for the brawny RAV4 – we still can’t believe Toyota has made a muscular SUV – or does the classically-styled Forester fit the bill better? Cast your vote below.

  • Soob

    As much as i like Subaru, the new Forester is just disappointing, so it’s the RAV4 for me.

    • WG

      Looking at the Ascent and the Forester, I am not having high expectations for their upcoming Outback.

    • RS6 Performance Wagon Lover

      I want to agree with you, but the RAV4 is just hideous.

  • Dennis Scipio

    It’s all about preference, if you want Standard All-Wheel Drive and good space pick the Forester, if you want something that says “Look at Me”and also good interior space. then pick the RAV4. Bottom line is, you can’t satisfy everybody all the time.

  • krusshall

    My forecast is that the Forester will continue its organic sales growth and that the RAV4 will lose sales as the rugged look will be a turn-off to the traditional Toyota/RAV4 customer base. CUVs have been successful as it melded car attributes with SUV attributes. Toyota is taking away the car-like styling for more rugged truck-let styling and that will not appeal to women and older buyers.

    • MarketAndChurch

      Was just about to say that, I don’t see the rugged look appealing to women, and women account for a large % of small SUV sales.

  • Mundek

    Neither (ICE is dead to me), but if I had to choose – the Toyota by a wide margin.
    Subaru has dropped the ball again and is headed down the path the most other Japanese manufacturers took about 8-10 years ago (only to backtrack from it recently). The 5th gen Forester will sell great, but its shameful what they’ve done to the lineup.

    • sk101

      Pretty scathing review of a car manufacturing experiencing excellent sales growth year or year for a few years now. What are your specific example of shameful things Subaru has done to drop the ball?

  • Autoexperte
    • Nick099

      That is a really nice interior….and I am no fan of either Toyo or Subie.

  • Belthronding

    I was expecting some wilder rav4 and it is done.but subaru supposed to be better looking car, spesificially rear end is a bit disappointing.

  • PhilMcGraw

    It might have been a closer match up in my mind if Subaru had continued to offer the turbocharged engine in an updated XT model, but for me the RAV4 is hard to beat. It has a more powerful base engine (203 hp/184 lb ft of torque compared to 182 hp/176 lb ft), has a more rugged exterior, a more upscale interior with better materials, and a hybrid model that promises to both be more powerful than the base model while also being more efficient. That’s some hard stuff to beat. The Forester does probably have better safety features standard (that’s kind of cool it can detect 5 different drivers) and it does still offer the best ground clearance at 8.7 inches.

  • Chris Zeidler

    It’s rather amazing Subaru still chooses to use camera’s rather than radar for it’s safety systems. That’s about as advanced as the Honda lane change camera which they are now finally updating to radar as well. Only Toyota has had both these systems standard in even the old gen Rav4 for two years already. I’m gonna love starting my new Rav4 with my Apple watch. 🙂

  • Nick099

    Are these cars based on the same platform?
    I know that Subaru is owned/controlled by Toyota.

    • moosearebrave

      No you don’t. Because Subaru is not owned or controlled by Toyota 🙄

      • Nick099

        16.5% ownership as reported by ABC. So a minority partner. I mean really, this is old news. They bought their stake after GM sold it.

        Oh no! You do know GM had the same interest in Subie a few years ago right?

    • William Plaster

      Please provide verification for your post.

  • Bikr

    No Android Auto on the RAV4 is a bummer.

    • getoffme

      Bluetooth will do.

      • Bikr

        Not for me. I’m a big fan of Waze and rather use the large screen that’s already built into the dash for navigation, notifications and media. While in-car systems can provide some of this via bluetooth, they usually have a poor user experience and aren’t updated or improved upon much after the car is released.

  • Romanovich

    not one, sorry

  • bicepeak

    RAV4 !

  • bd0007

    Both are fugly in their attempts to be “faux-rugged.”

  • Steven Sposato

    They’re both fine cars, but painfully boring. At least Toyota made the Rav4 look kind of cool. Neither have the power to back it up though and the Forrester’s interior still looks like it was last updated in 1995.

    • William Plaster

      Why change something that sells without annual frills to entice buyers? The VW beetle remained the same for years and it didn’t hurt its appeal or sales. My only complaint about the Subaru is the discontinuing the turbo.

  • Paul

    I would have to go with the RAV4 even though I’m preferential towards the Subaru.

  • ErnieB

    RAV4.. they should have called it something else though..

  • erly5

    Let me think. The bang up to date RAV4 or the hideously outdated looking Forester? It’s a no-brainer!

    • sk101

      So the Forster loses on looks alone? What is it about the RAV4 that is up to date while the Forester is not up to date? RAV4 is not Android Auto capable but Forester is… that’s at least on item that the RAV4 is actually not up to date.

      • William Plaster

        Twenty plus HP by the RAV4 is a start. If Subaru needed to drop the turbo, at least they could match their competitor’s power. I still am undecided until I drive both vehicles.

  • Harry_Wild

    Both are not that attractive looking but I not going off roading; so I going to go with a luxury large size crossover for space and nice styling! Yes it double the cost of the base price but it more to my liking!

  • William Plaster

    I find the face recognition a great feature. At least Subaru is attempting to do something to warn distracted drivers to keep their eyes on the road, not on the cell phone or looking at their passenger. The
    RAV4 front looks more like a truck than a car. Also, while I generally like the RAV4 of 2018, I am reluctant to spend $30K+ on a totally new vehicle that hasn’t been fully tested.. Another major factor is the Subaru CVT is alleged to be superior to other manufacturers. I am also considering the Mazda CX5, primarily because of it has the conventional transmission. You could say I am facing a major conundrum.

  • William Plaster

    I can remember when they removed the ‘spark’ function from cars, and people said a starter button will never work. I am old, but still want a 2019 vehicle with all the technology. Haven’t decided which top 4 SUV I will get, but it will have all of the ‘bells and whistles’.

Kevin Hart’s Plymouth Barracuda Crash Investigated By Californian Authorities

The California Highway Patrol may recommend modified cars like Hart’s are fitted with five-point safety harnesses.

2020 Genesis G90 Vs. 2019 Mercedes S-Class: Underdog Takes On Top Dog

The 2020 G90 is fantastic value for money, but is it good enough to take on the luxury segment’s benchmark?.

Here’s a Close Look At The ID.3, Volkswagen’s Most Important New Car In Many Decades

The all-new compact electric hatchback is available in three different battery and electric motor configurations.

Mercedes SL 73 AMG: Rarer Than A Pagani Zonda And The Coolest R129 Of Them All

If you like 1990s AMGs, this SL 73 is the pick of the decade, packing a healthy 525 HP and being made in no more than 50 examples .

What Is BMW Testing With This M8 Prototype At The Nurburgring?

One possibility is that it’s an even more hardcore variant of the Competition, and another that the rear wing is going to be offered as an M Performance part.

Bugatti CEO Reveals More Track-Focused Chiron Variants Are Coming

Now that it has made a point about its hypercar’s top speed with the 300+, Bugatti will turn its attention to other aspects like power-to-weight ratio and ultimate handling.

Check Out This Frosted Glass Blue Audi R8 Coupe With A Dual-Tone Interior

Adding an Audi Exclusive color to your R8 V10 Coupe will cost you nearly $4k in the States for a matte finish – otherwise, you’re looking at close to $7k.

Ford Sells Its Canvas Vehicle Subscription Service To Fair

Canvas only served a reported 3,800 customers, while Fair’s app-based subscription program has been downloaded more than 3.2 million times.

Ferrari Shall Keep Production Below Demand To Safeguard Its Status

Ferrari say they will always deliver one car less than the market demands in order to maintain their models’ desirability .

Australia’s Jeep Grand Cherokee Upland Edition Is Limited To 44 Units

Jeep’s latest limited-run Grand Cherokee is already available at dealerships Down Under, with prices starting at AUD $61,450.